S. Thulasinathan v. B. Anbu
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was dismissed due to non-prosecution as the counsel for the petitioner was consistently absent.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.R.P(PD)No. 915 of 2018 and C.M.P.No. 4957 of 2018
S.Thulasinathan ...Petitioner Vs. B.Anbu ...Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the impugned order passed by the learned District Munsif of Mannargudi dated 22.11.2017 made in I.A.No. 330 of 2017 in I.A.No. 454 of 2016 in O.S.NO. 115 of 2016.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : No Appearance
O R D E R
Since the counsel for the petitioner was consistently absent, the revision was posted for dismissal today. Even today, the counsel for the petitioner is absent.
- Hence, this civil revision petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.
Sub Assistant Registrar
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Thulasinathan
- respondent
B.Anbu
Coram
R.Subramanian
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court