The suit is filed for permanent injunction. The suit property belongs to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs 2 & 3 are the sons of the first plaintiff. The suit property was originally purchased by the husband of the first plaintiff, by registered sale deed dated 17.09.1964 and on the date of sale, the possession of the suit property was delivered to the husband of the first plaintiff. In fact, after execution of the sale deed, it was registered compulsorily. The suit property is a dry land. Later, the adjacent properties have been converted into house sites. Therefore, the plaintiffs decided to convert the suit property into house sites and they have applied for permission for laying out the suit property into house plots. Thereafter, they came to understand that the Urban Land Ceiling Act is in implementation and as such, the permission was not granted in favour of the plaintiffs. The entire suit property comprised in G.S.134/1 admeasuring an extent of 8.04 acres. The vendors namely, the defendants sold only one acre retaining the remaining extent. Apart from the defendants, one Marudakkal also got share in the property comprised in G.S.No. 135/1. Though the plaintiffs purchased the property, they did not take any steps to change the revenue records in their name and the kist was being paid only in the name of said Marudakkal, who has got share in the property comprised in G.S.No. 135/1. In fact, when the husband of the plaintiff was alive, a roof shed was put up on the suit property and after his demise, it was used as cow stables. While being so, the defendants are disturbing the possession and enjoyment of the suit property and also preventing the plaintiffs from converting the suit property into house sites. Hence, the suit.
