Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Anandayee Ammal Vs Arjuna Gramani — Partition | Madras HC (2020)

Home
Madras HC
2020
Anandayee Ammal Vs Arjuna GramaniAnandayee Ammal v. Arjuna Gramani

Dismissed

Anandayee Ammal v. Arjuna Gramani

Madras HC21 Jan 2020SA/450/1994

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second appeal dismissed as abated due to death of the appellant without instructions from legal heirs.

What did the court decide?

Second appeal dismissed as abated. No costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.01.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

S.A.No. 450 of 1994

1.Anandayee Ammal(died)

2.D.Devanatha
(2 nd Appellant is brought on record as legal heirs of the
deceased 1 st Appellant vide C.M.P.No.7938 of 1997)
..Appellants
Vs.
1.Arjuna Gramani(deceased)
2.Rajambal
3.Neelambal(died)
4.Sridaran
5.Nadarajan(deceased)
6.Janarthanan
7.Kanagavalli
8.Sridevi(deceased)
9.Natchiar(deceased)
10.Arul
11.Kaladevi
12.Madhavi
13.Kumarappan
14.Baskaran
15.Narasinga Bharathi
16.Kannagi
(RR11 to 16 declared as major and the guardian discharged from
guardian ship vide order dt.28.3.2002 made in CMP No.1383/02)
17.Namadevu
18.A.Gnanamurthy
19.S.Chandrasekaran
20.S.Madhavan
21.S.Saravanan
22.S.Shankar
23.S.Elango
24.S.Durgadevi
25.N.Namadevan
26.N.Sadagopan

1

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

27.Indirani 28.Muthukumarasamy 29.Karpagam 30.Vijayalakshmi 31.Sivagama Sundari 32.Baradhan 33.Seethapathi 34.Sathupathi 35.Ragupathi 36.Karthigeyan 37.Prabavathi 38.Amsaveni 39.Komathi *(R18 to R24 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased 1^st respondent Vide order of Court dated 20.02.2008 made in C.M.P.No. 519 & 520 of 2005 in S.A.No.450 of 1994) *(R25 & 26 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased, 3^rd respondent vide order of Court dated 18.03.2014 made in C.M.P.Nos.1848 to 1850/2009 in S.A.No.450 of 1994) *(R27 to 31 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased, 5^th respondent vide order of Court dated 06.06.2014 made in C.M.P.Nos.1851 to 1859/2009 in S.A.No.450 of 1994) *(R32 to R38 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased, 8^th respondent vide order of Court dated 06.06.2014 made in C.M.P.Nos.1851 to 1859/2009 in S.A.No.450 of 1994)

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

CPC100

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Anandayee Ammal(died)
respondent
Arjuna Gramani(deceased)
respondent
Rajambal

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 21 Jan 2020 · January
Registered: 25 Mar 1994
Case no.: SA/450/1994

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from G.k. Ilanthiraiyan

Ramathal@Nagammal(Died) Vs Nanjammal@Chinnathambi
20 Jan 2020
Pattappa Gounder Vs Valliammal
20 Jan 2020
Kathunbi Vs K.a.Subham
20 Jan 2020
S. Sambasivam @ Raja Sthapathy Vs the Inspector of Police
21 Jan 2020

Cite this judgement

Anandayee Ammal v. Arjuna Gramani, SA/450/1994 (MAD), decided on 21 January 2020.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

CPC100

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Second appeal dismissed as abated. No costs.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

In this second appeal regarding partition and inheritance, the appellant had died. With no instructions from the legal heirs of the deceased appellant, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted to the dismissal of the appeal on grounds of abatement. The High Court of Madras held the appeal to be abated and dismissed it, costs notwithstanding.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

*(R39 brought on record as legal heir of the deceased, 9^th respondent vide order of Court dated 06.06.2014 made in C.M.P.Nos.1851 to 1859/2009 in S.A.No.450 of 1994)

...Respondents

*The second appeal is dismissed as abated as against the 32^nd respondent vide order dated 19.12.2019).

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section. 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree dated 25.08.1993 made in A.S.No.144 of 1989, on the file of the Court of the Second Additional District Judge at Pondicherry, setting aside the judgment and preliminary decree dated 12.04.1988 made in O.S.No.73 of 1980, on the file of the Court of the First Additional Sub-Judge at Pondicherry.

2

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Appellant :Mr.T.P.Manoharan

For Respondents:Mr.T.R.Rajaraman for R4 to R7

Mr.K.Selvarajan for R10 to R17 Mr.A.Umapathy for R25 to R26 Respondents 1, 2, 3, 8 & 9 died Respondents 11 to 20, 21 to 24, 27, 28, 29 to 31, 33 to 39-Notice served R32 died

J U D G M E N T

This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 25.08.1993 made in A.S.No.144 of 1989, on the file of the Court of the Second Additional District Judge at Pondicherry, setting aside the judgment and preliminary decree dated 12.04.1988 made in O.S.No.73 of 1980, on the file of the Court of the First Additional Sub-Judge at Pondicherry.

Originally the sole appellant filed this second appeal and she died. Subsequently, her son was impleaded as appellant. Now, the said appellant also died. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that no instructions from the legal heirs of the deceased appellant. Therefore, this second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kkn
To:-
1.The Second Additional District Judge,
Pondicherry.

2.The First Additional Sub-Judge, Pondicherry. +1cc to M/s.T.P.Manoharan, Advocate SR.4520 +1cc to M/s.T.R.Rajaraman, Advocate SR.4512 S.A.No. 450 of 1994 BP(CO) CB(25/02/2020)

3

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

CNR

HCMA010007651994

Topic

Bench

G.k. Ilanthiraiyan

Disposal

DISMISSED AS ABATED

Chandra and 3 Others Vs T Natarajan and 5 Others

21 Jan 2020

S.P.Balasubrmania Chettiar Vs Sairam

21 Jan 2020