This Second Appeal was dismissed solely due to the non-prosecution of the appellant whofailed to appear despite being listed for dismissal. No substantive legal principle was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
S.A.No.641 of 2015
and
C.M.P.No.10575 of 2020
Subbathal ..Appellant
Vs.
1.P.Kousalya @ Patel
2.Ramasamy
3.V.Dhanam ..Respondents
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against
the judgment and decree dated 25.09.2014 passed in A.S.No.82 of
2013 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore
confirming the judgment and decree dated 25.06.2013 passed in
O.S.No.529 of 2007 on the file of the I Additional Sub Court,
Coimbatore.
For Appellant : No Appearance
For Respondents: Mr.Venkatasamy for R2
J U D G M E N T
This matter is taken up for hearing through Video-
Conferencing.
2. T he learned counsel for the appellant is continuously
absent. Despite the appeal being listed under the caption “For
Dismissal” none appears for the appellant. Hence, the Second
Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is also
closed.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
Copy to
The Section Officer VR Section High Court, Madras 104.
S.A.No.641 of 2015
KV(CO)
SP(20/01/2021)
Subbathal
P. Kousalya @ Patel
Ramasamy
V. Dhanam
R. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
