This court dismissed a Civil Revision petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution as having become infructuous. The petition was made infructuous because the suit from which the revision arose had already been disposed of on merits by a judgment and decree.
The Civil Revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP (PD) No.1245 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
CRP (PD) No.1245 of 2018 and
CMP No.6368 of 2018
K.Padmanaban ... Petitioner
Vs
1. A.Vivek Anand
2. K.V.Kothandaraju ... Respondents
Prayer: The Civil Revision petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution
of India, against the docket order, dated 21.02.2018 made in O.S.No.10 of
2013 on the file of the Court of the II Additional District Judge, Vellore at
Ranipet, Vellore District.
For Petitioner : Mrs.M.R.Sakunthala For Respondents : Mr.Y.Jyothish Chander (for R1) No appearance for R2
1/3
CRP (PD) No.1245 of 2018
O R D E R
Mr.Y.Jyothish Chander, learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent would submit that the suit in O.S.No.36 of 2012 out of which the present revision arises itself has been disposed off on merits and he has
filed an appeal against the said Judgment and Decree, before this Court.
2/3
CRP (PD) No.1245 of 2018
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
vum
CRP (PD) No.1245 of 2018 and
CMP No.6368 of 2018
04.12.2020
3/3
K.Padmanaban
A.Vivek Anand
K.V.Kothandaraju
R.Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
