D. Vasudevan v. Tmt. Indirani
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed the second appeal as settled out of court upon submission by the counsel for the appellant. No costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
Disposal of the second appeal by dismissal as settled out of court.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
S.A.No. 242 of 2014
D.Vasudevan ...Appellant/Plaintiff
Vs.
1.Indirani 2.Rathinam 3.Kuppusamy 4.The Junior Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Ambarampalayam Post, Pollachi Taluk. 5.The Divisional Engineer, O&M, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Power House, Udumalpet Road, Pollachi. ...Respondents/Defendants Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No. 11 of 2010 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Coimbatore dated 02.12.2011 confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No. 6 of 2008 on the file of the Sub-Court, Pollachi dated 14.12.2009.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Gunalan
For Respondents : Mr.V.Anandha Moorthy for R1 Mr.V.Viswanathan for R4 &R5 R2 & R3 - No appearance O R D E R
The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the matter has been settled out of Court and seek permission withdraw the appeal. Recording the said statement, this second appeal is dismissed as settled out of Court. No costs.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
D.Vasudevan
- respondent
Indirani 2.Rathinam
- respondent
Kuppusamy
- respondent
The Junior Engineer, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Ambarampalayam Post, Pollachi Taluk
- respondent
The Divisional Engineer, O&M, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, Power House, Udumalpet Road, Pollachi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court