Allowed

Sankaran v. No Respondent

Madras HC7 Jan 2020OP/592/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Madras considered an original petition filed by the legal heirs of V. Natarajan. The court found that the first petitioner was the son and others were siblings, and no will existed. The petition was allowed granting a succession certificate to the first petitioner. A case did not help. Order XXV Rule 6 of O.S. Rules. The certificate was granted with power to collect securities an

What did the court decide?

Succession certificate granted to the first petitioner to collect securities, receive interest and dividends and negotiate and transfer the securities specified in the schedule.

Sankaran Vs No Respondent — Succession and Inheritance | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

¶5

O.P. No.592 of 2019

¶6

In the matter of Section Succession Act XXXIX of 1925 and In the matter of certain Securities in respect of Mr.V.Natarajan – deceased Intestate.

¶7

O.P. No.592 of 2019:

¶8

Mr.SANKARAN.N. (52 years), No.2, Nehru Street, Anna Nagar, Pammal, Chennai-600075. 2. MEENAKSHI SUNDARAM.N.(85 years) W/o.Natarajan, No.2, Nehru Street, Anna Nagar, Pammal, Chennai-600075. 3. Mrs.ANANDAVALLI R.(61 years) W/o.Radhakrishnan, Palayakaran Cross Street, Kodambakkam, Chennai-600024.

¶9

Mrs.RAJESWARI K.(57 years) W/o.Kalanjiappan No.1, Shanthi Nagar, Lospet, Pondicherry.

¶10

Mr.RAMESH N.(54 years) No.2, Nehru Street, Anna Nagar, Pammal, Chennai-600075. ..Petitioners

¶11

Original Petition praying that this Hon'ble Court be pleased that a Succession certificate may be granted to the 1st petitioner with power to collect the securities and to receive the interset and dividends on and negotiate and transfer the securities specified in the Schedule.

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

¶14

This Original Petition coming on this day before this court for hearing, the court made the following order:

¶15

This petition has been filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 and Order XXV Rule 6 of O.S.Rules to grant succession certificate in favour of the first petitioner with power to collect the securities and to receive the interest and dividends thereon and negotiate and transfer the securities specified in the schedule to the petition.

¶16

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits

¶18

that the first petitioner is the son of the late Mr.V.Natarajan, who died at Hindu Mission Hospital, West Tambaram, Chennai-600 075 on 26.10.2013 and ordinarily resided at No.2, Nehru Street, Anna Nagar, Pammal, Chennai600 075, which is within the jurisdiction of this Court. He further submitted that the second petitioner is his mother and petitioners 3 to 5 are his siblings.

¶19

In support of the petition, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that evidence was adduced and that the first petitioner was examined as PW1. During the course of the evidence of PW1, he submitted that the following twelve documents were exhibited:-

¶20

Ex.P1 is the photocopy of the letter dated

¶21

22.05.1995 addressed to V.Natarajan regarding

¶22

PNB Equity Growth Fund (Marked after

¶23

comparing and verifying with the original).

¶24

Ex.P2 is the photocopy of the letter dated

¶25

27.12.2003 sent to Mr.V.Natarajan by TVS

¶26

Motor Company Limited along with the

¶27

photocopy of the share certificate bearing

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ certificate No.007138 standing in the name of

¶29

V.Natarajan issued by TVS Motor Company

¶30

¶31

Limited.

¶32

Ex.P3 is the photocopy of the letter dated 13.09.2005 sent to V.Natarajan by Hindalco Industries Limited.

¶33

Ex.P4 is the photocopy of the first petitioner's Aadhaar card bearing No.8639 5982 9599.

¶34

Ex.P5 is the photocopy of the death certificate of V.Natarajan, who died on 26.10.2013.

¶35

Ex.P6 is the photocopy of the Legal Heirship Certificate dated 21.05.2014 in respect of V.Natarajan.

¶36

Ex.P7 is the photocopy of the Aadhaar card of the 2^nd petitioner Meenakshi Sundaram bearing No.6835 3068 1254.

¶37

Ex.P8 is the photo copy of the Aadhaar card of the 3^rd petitioner Anandavalli bearing No.9660 1105 3121.

¶38

Ex.P9 is the photo copy of the Electoral Identity Card of the 4^th petitioner Rajeswari bearing No.PY/01/003.

¶39

Ex.P10 is the photocopy of the Aadhaar card of the 5^th petitioner Ramesh bearing No.9840 7873 4131.

¶40

11.Ex.P11 is the joint consent affidavit given https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

by the petitioners 2 to 5.

¶42

effected in one issue of Tamil daily “Makkal Kural” dated 27.09.2019.

¶43

On the above basis, he submitted that the petition may be allowed by granting Succession Certificate to the first petitioner.

¶44

I considered the submissions of the learned

¶45

counsel and examined the evidance on record.

¶46

From the above, the following is evident:

¶47

first petitioner's father has been

¶48

filed as Ex.P5.

¶49

Heirship Certificate dated 21.05.2014 of the first petitioner's father is filed as Ex.P6 and the said document (Ex.P6) shows that the petitioners are the only class-I legal heirs of the deceased, Mr.V.Natarajan.

¶50

of petitioners 2 to 5 has been filed as Ex.P11.

¶51

been filed as Ex.P12.

¶52

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶53

¶54

found in spite of carrying out diligent search for a Will. It is further stated that no application was made to any District Court or delegate or to any High Court for Probate of any Will of the deceased or for Letters of Administration with or without a Will annexed. It is further stated that no application for a Succession Certificate was made previously in respect of any debt or security belonging to the estate of the deceased V.Natarajan to any District Court or delegate or to any High Court.

¶55

Based on the foregoing, I am of the view that the first petitioner is entitled to succeed to the estate of the deceased. Therefore, this Original Petition is allowed and it is directed that the Succession Certificate be granted to the first Petitioner in respect of the assets mentioned in the schedule to the petition with the power to collect the securities and to receive the interest and dividends thereon and negotiate and transfer the securities specified in the schedule.

¶56

//Certified to be a true copy//

¶57

Dated this the th day of 2020.

¶58

SU/20.01.2020 COURT OFFICER

¶59

From 25.09.2008 th e Registry is issuing certified copies of the Order/Judgment Decree in this format.

¶60

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Sankaran v. No Respondent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sankaran v. No Respondent

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ifci Financial Services Ltd. Vs Mrs.Chandra Ramesh and another

Mr.M.K.M. Aboobakar Vs Ajima Beevi

S.R.Jangid Ips, Vs v.Vidya

Ijm-Scl Jv Vs M/S.National Highway Authority

C. Nagarajan Vs U. Karthikeyan

M/S.Delkon(India) Pvt. Limited Vs M/S.Bharat Heavy Electricals