Suit filed by a director declaration injunction decreed as per Memorandum of Compromise entered parties.
Suit decreed in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise dated 04.11.2020 forming part of the decree.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.S.No.157 OF 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.11.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISHKUMAR
1/4
C.S.No.157 OF 2020
Prayer: Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rul3 1 of the Original Side Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 a) declaring that the alleged notice dated 15.04.2020 calling for an EGM and the consequent alleged EGM and the resolution dated 11.05.2020 passed therein by the first defendant are illegal, void and non-est in law, b) grant a decree of perpetual injunction restraining the 2nd defendant his men, agents, servants and subordinates from interfering with the rights of the plaintiff as
the Director of the first defendant.
For Plaintiff : Mr. Sharath Chandran
For Defendants 1 to 3 : Mr.K.Venkateswaran
ORDER
(The case has been heard through video conference)
The learned counsels appearing for the plaintiff and the defendants
filed a memorandum of compromise entered into between the parties duly signed by the plaintiff and the authorised signatory of the defendants. The plaintiff and the authorised signatory of the defendants are identified by their respective counsels through video conference.
2/4
C.S.No.157 OF 2020
parties is recorded.
3/4
C.S.No.157 OF 2020
N. SATHISHKUMAR, J.
mst
C.S.No.157 of 2020
06.11.2020
4/4
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jet Inks Private Limited
N. SATHISHKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
