The High Court considered an application under Section 92 of the CPC seeking leave to frame a scheme regarding temple properties. The court noted a dispute between the parties and allowed the application.
The application for leave to sue under Section 92 of the CPC was allowed to frame a scheme for temple properties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Application.No.6079 of 2016
Application.No.6079 of 2016 in C.S.D.No.42691 of 2016
N.SATHISH KUMAR.J
This application has been filed by the applicants to grant leave to sue
the applicants herein for filing the suit under Section 92 of C.P.C.
that the suit filed for framing the scheme. The very nature of the application
filed for the interest of the temple in general. Though, there is dispute interse between the parties, the dispute mainly with regard to the temple properties.
05.11.2020
msv
Page No.2/2
Application.No.6079 of 2016
N.SATHISH KUMAR.J
msv
Application.No.6079 of 2016
in C.S.D.No.42691 of 2016
05.11.2020
Page No.2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application under Section 92 of the CPC should be allowed to frame a scheme for a temple property where there is a dispute between parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The Applicants
The Respondents
N.SATHISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
