Disposed

Sakkarai v. Palraj

Madras HC11 Nov 2020CRP(MD)/867/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court directed the Sub Judge, Thirumangalam to dispose of appeal suit A.S.No.82 of 2019 on merits within six months of receipt of the order, considering the appellant's advanced age and poor health. The petitioner approached under Article 227 seeking early disposal of a long-pending suit.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Sub Judge, Thirumangalam to dispose of A.S.No.82 of 2019 on merits within six months from the date of receipt of the order.

Sakkarai Vs Palraj — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

C.R.P(MD).No.867 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 11.11.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M. GOVINDARAJ

¶6

C.R.P(MD).No.867 of 2020

¶7

Sakkarai

¶8

... Petitioner/Appellant

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.Palraj 2.Sivasami ... Respondents/Respondents

¶11

Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the learned Sub Judge, Thirumangalam, to dispose of the appeal suit in A.S.No.82 of 2019 on the file of the Sub Court, Thirumangalam, within a time frame fixed by this Court.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Kannan

¶13

ORDER

¶14

Aggrieved over the long pendency of the appeal suit in A.S.No.82 of 2019 on the file of the Sub Court, Thirumangalam, the petitioner has approached this Court for early disposal of above said appeal suit.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Since the case is for a limited relief of early disposal, no notice need be sent to the respondents.

¶16

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the appellant in the appeal suit is 89 years old and he is not in good health condition and therefore, he seeks early disposal of the appeal suit in A.S.No.82 of 2019, pending on the file of the Sub Court, Thirumangalam.

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the learned Sub Judge, Thirumangalam, to dispose of A.S.No.82 of 2019, pending on its file, on merits and in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably, within a period of six months from the date https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶18

1/2

¶19

C.R.P(MD).No.867 of 2020

¶20

With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶23

// True Copy //

¶24

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶25

PJL

¶26

Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶27

¶28

The Sub Judge,Thirumangalam.

¶29

+1 CC to M/s.K. KANNAN, Advocate ( SR-21977[F] dated 11/11/2020 )

¶30

C.R.P(MD).No.867 of 2020 11.11.2020

¶31

KM(CO) TR(26.11.2020) 2P 3C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

Sakkarai v. Palraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sakkarai v. Palraj

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mani, Vs Ponnusami Pillai

Kamatchi Vs The Inspector of Police

Rinihappuchjeyarenjini Vs John Naveenraj

Rajadurai Vs Pavithra

P.Thondiraj Vs Mahalingam

Lingeswaran Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police