Allowed

Mani, v. Ponnusami Pillai

Madras HC10 Nov 2020CMP(MD)/1750/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On the petition of the appellant Mani, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court permitted the substitution of certified copies for original documents (Exs.B1, B6, B7) in Second Appeal No.888 of 2010, allowing the appellant to return the originals. The respondent had no objection.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to substitute certified copies of Exs. B1, B6 and B7 for the original documents and get back the originals.

Mani, Vs Ponnusami Pillai — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CMP(MD) No.1750 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶4

Tuesday, the Tenth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.GOVINDARAJ

¶7

CMP(MD) No.1750 of 2020 IN SA(MD) No.888 of 2010

¶8

MANI ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT

¶9

PONNUSAMI PILLAI ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶10

Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner/Appellant in the above Second Appeal to get the return of the Documents Ex.B1, Ex.B6 and Ex.B7 marked in O.S.No.208 of 1999 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thuraiyur by replacing the same with the certified copies of the said Documents.

¶11

Prayer in SA(MD) No.888 of 2010:

¶12

To prefer the Memorandum of grounds of Second Appeal against the Judgment and Decree dated on 15.07.2009 in A.S.No.208/2008 on the file of learned Subordinate Judge, Trichy, confirming the decree dated 30.11.2007 in O.S.No.208 of 99 on the file of learned District Munsif Thuraiur, Trichy.

¶13

ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.SIDDHARTHAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.R.SUNDAR, Advocate on behalf of the Respondent, the Court made the following order:-

¶14

The petitioner / appellant filed a petition for return of original documents viz., Exs. B1, B6 and B7, after substituting the certified copies of the documents.

¶15

The counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to allow this petition.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/2

¶18

CMP(MD) No.1750 of 2020

¶19

Considering the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to substitute the certified copies of Exs.B1, B6 and B7 and get back the original documents.

¶20

This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶21

sd/10/11/2020

¶22

/ TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶23

¶24

THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, TRICHY.

¶25

THE DISTRICT MUNSIF, THURAIYUR.

¶26

COPY TO:

¶27

THE SECTION OFFICER, VR SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶28

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.1750 of 2020 IN SA(MD) No.888 of 2010 Date :10/11/2020

¶29

TRP

¶30

SRS/AKM/SAR-IV/20.11.2020/2P/4C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2/2

Mani, v. Ponnusami Pillai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mani, v. Ponnusami Pillai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sowthun Begum Vs K. Mohammed Ali

Lakshmana Pillai (Died)(2) Sundaram (Died) (3) Thiruvu Konar, Vs Alangaravel

Usha Vs Manohar

Kamatchi Vs The Inspector of Police

Rinihappuchjeyarenjini Vs John Naveenraj

V.P.Alagarsamy(Died) Vs the Special Tahsildar (La)