Kannagi Manimaran v. Mrs. N. Kausalya
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 was dismissed as the petitioner was absent and had withdrawn appearance, resulting in default dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD) No.4549 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.02.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
C.R.P.(NPD) No.4549 of 2014
and
M.P.No.1 of 2014
Mrs.Kannagi Manimaran ...Petitioner
..Vs..
1.Mrs.N.Kausalya
2.M/s.Thulasi Constructions,
Represented by Shri.Vijayakumar
3.The Executive Engineer,
Zone X, N.S.K.Salai, Corporation of Chennai,
Kodambakkam,
Chennai - 600 024.
4.The Corporation of Chennai,
Represented by its Commissioner,
Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building,
Chennai - 600 003. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, against the order of Suspension dated 14.11.2014 made in C.M.P.No.1417 of 2014 in C.M.A.No.126 of 2014, passed by the V Additional City Civil Court at Chennai.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ilangovan For R3&R4 : Mr.S.Jaganathan, Government Advocate
C.R.P.(NPD) No.4549 of 2014
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.,
nvi
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is no longer appearing in this matter and he has given change of vakalath. Today, the matter is posted under the caption 'for dismissal'. The petitioner called absent. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
11.02.2020
nvi
Index:Yes/No Speaking Order:Yes/No To
The V Additional City Civil Court at Chennai.
C.R.P.(NPD) No.4549 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kannagi Manimaran
N.Kausalya
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court