Sampath v. Kanna Gounder
Case brief
What is this about?
A civil revision petition was filed challenging an order allowing an amendment application in the final decree of a partition suit. The High Court rejected the revision petition and dismissed the appeal.
What did the court decide?
The civil revision petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(NPD) No.2975 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.02.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
C.R.P.(NPD) No.2975 of 2011
and
M.P.No.1 of 2011
Sampath ...Petitioner
..Vs..
1.Kanna Gounder
2.Devarajan
3.Saradambal
4.Banu
5.Manickammal
6.Varadharaju Gounder
7.Rajamanickam Gounder
8.Pushpavalli
9.Malarkodi
10.Pachaiyammal
11.Radha
12.Valarmathi
13.Minor Saritha
14.Minor Kamaraj
15.Meena
[cause title accepted vide order of the
1/6
C.R.P.(NPD) No.2975 of 2011
Court dated 04.08.2011 made in M.P.2/11 in CRP.SR.No.77132/2010] ...Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C, against
the fair and decreetal order dated 30.11.2009 in I.A.No.294 of 2008 in I.A.No.337 of 1996 in O.S.No.894 of 1981 on the file of the Principal
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition against the order amending the final decree in a partition suit should be allowed.
Whether the High Court should interfere with the District Munsif Court's decision to allow the amendment application.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sampath
- respondent
Kanna Gounder
- respondent
Devarajan
- respondent
Saradambal
- respondent
Banu
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court