Nallusamy v. Pappayee
Case brief
What is this about?
An application under Article 226 was dismissed as reinfructuous because the underlying suit proceedings had already been disposed of by the court below.
What did the court decide?
Null
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.R.P(PD)No. 3514 of 2018
and
C.M.P.No. 19685 of 2018
Nallusamy ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.Pappayee
2.Navaleri
3.Kolanthaivel ...Respondents
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India, against the order and decreetal order
passed in I.A.No. 70 of 2017 in O.S.No. 482 of 2013, dated
27.02.2018 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court,
Namakkal.
For Petitioner : Mr.Varun Karthik for Mr.C.Jagadish
For Respondents : No appearance
O R D E R
Mr.Varun Karthik for Mr.C.Jagadish, learned counsel for
the petitioner would submit that the civil revision petition has
become infructuous, since the suit itself has been disposed of
on 27.08.2020.
2. Recording the said statement, this civil revision
petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No
costs.
Sd/-
Asst. Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Asst. Registrar
kkn
To:
The Additional District Munsif Court, Namakkal.
+1 C.C.to Mr.C.Jagadish, ADVOCATE, SR.NO.39844/2020
C.R.P(PD)No. 3514 of 2018 and C.M.P.No. 19685 of 2018
VC (05/01/2021)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nallusamy
- respondent
Pappayee
- respondent
Navaleri
- respondent
Kolanthaivel
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court