B. Jayavel v. v. Venugopal
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous when the petitioner's counsel submitted that no further issues survived for consideration, closing the connected C.M.P. as well.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected C.M.P. closed.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(NPD) No.3052 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.03.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
C.R.P.(NPD) No.3052 of 2016
- B.Jayavel
- Padmavadi ... Petitioners
vs.
V.Venugopal ..Respondent
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 06.01.2016 in E.A.No.3606 of 2014 in E.P.No.1238 of 2013 in O.S.No.8564 of 1976 on the file of the X Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
B.Jayavel
- petitioner
Padmavadi
- respondent
V.Venugopal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court