Petitioner sought to withdraw a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226. The court granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, closing connected proceedings.
Permission to withdraw granted; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD) No.3043 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.03.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN
C.R.P.(PD) No.3043 of 2016
Tamilmaran ... Petitioner
vs.
N.Balakrishnan (Died)
rep. By his legal heirs
1. Saroja
2. Kalarani
3. Sampath
4. Murali ..Respondents
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of
India seeking to set aside the order dated 05.07.2016 passed in I.A.No.489 of 2016 in O.S.No.24 of 2014 on the file of the Principal District Court
at Pondicherry.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Visvasundaram for M/s.Achari and Antony Associates
For Respondents : Mr.R.Praveen Kumar O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for
the Petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Petition and he has also made an endorsement in the case bundle to that effect.
Page No.1 of 3
C.R.P.(NPD) No.3043 of 2016
withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected C.M.P.No.15395 of 2016
is closed.
18.03.2020
Index : Yes/No
(aeb)
To: The Principal District Court, Pondicherry.
Page No.2 of 3
C.R.P.(NPD) No.3043 of 2016
S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.
(aeb)
C.R.P.(NPD) No.3043 of 2016
18.03.2020
Page No.3 of 3
Tamilmaran
N.Balakrishnan (Died) rep. By his legal heirs Saroja Kalarani Sampath Murali
S.VAIDYANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
