Dismissed

Aandal v. V.G.P Housing (Pvt Ltd.,)

Madras HC11 Dec 2020CRP/2705/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Madras considered a Civil Revision Petition and connected Miscellaneous Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. The court held that the revision petition became infructuous as the underlying suit was finally disposed of and dismissed it without costs.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed. No costs.

Aandal Vs V.G.P Housing (Pvt Ltd.,) — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRP PD. No.2705 of 2018 and CMP No.15978 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 11.12.2020

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN

¶6

CRP PD. No.2705 of 2018
and CMP No.15978 of 2018
Anandal .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. V.G.P.Housing Private Limited,
Company having registered office at
VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road,
Saithapet Post, Chennai.
Rep. By its Managing Director, G.Santhosam,
VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road,
Saithapet Post, Chennai.
2. G.Santhosam, Chairman
V.G.P.Housing Private Limited,
Company having registered office at
VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road,
Saithapet Post, Chennai.
3. V.G.Selvaraj, Vice Chairman/Director
Company having registered office at
VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road,
Saithapet Post, Chennai.
4. V.G.P.Ravidas, Director
V.G.P.Housing Private Limited,

¶7

1/4

¶8

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶9

CRP PD. No.2705 of 2018 and CMP No.15978 of 2018

¶10

Company having registered office at VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road, Saithapet Post, Chennai.

¶11

V.G.P. Rajadas, Director, V.G.P.Housing Private Limited, Company having registered office at VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road, Saithapet Post, Chennai.

¶12

V.G.P.Babudas, Director, V.G.P.Housing Private Limited, Company having registered office at VGP Square, No.6 Dharmaraja Kovil Road, Saithapet Post, Chennai.

¶13

M.R.Thirugnanasambandam,

¶14

Rajammal 9. Parimalam 10. Yasodha ..Respondents

¶15

(R-7 to R-10 ex-parte before the Trial Court. Hence, they were given up)

¶16

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the fair and final order dated 05.03.2018 in I.A.No.954 of 2017 in O.S.No.126 of 2009 on the file of Sub Court,

¶17

Perundurai.

¶18

2/4

¶19

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶20

CRP PD. No.2705 of 2018 and CMP No.15978 of 2018

¶21

For Petitioners : Ms.J.Prithvi for M/s.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran For Respondents : Mr. S.Rajalakshmi for M/s.Shivakumar and Suresh for RR 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 No appearance R3 ORDER This matter is taken up for hearing through Video-Conferencing. Ms.J.Prithvi, learned counsel appearing for M/s.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran, for the petitioner would submit that the Civil Revision Petition have become infructuous, since the suit itself has been disposed of. 2. Recording the said statement the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶22

11.12.2020 jv Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking order/Non Speaking order

¶23

3/4

¶24

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶25

CRP PD. No.2705 of 2018 and CMP No.15978 of 2018

¶26

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

¶27

¶28

To
1. The Sub Court,
Perundurai.
2. The Section Officer,
V.R.Section, High Court of Madras.
CRP PD. No.2705 of 2018
and CMP No.15978 of 2018
11.12.2020

¶29

4/4

¶30

http://www.judis.nic.in

Aandal v. V.G.P Housing (Pvt Ltd.,)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aandal v. V.G.P Housing (Pvt Ltd.,)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Sundaram Vs K.Subramanian

S.Sivaprakasam Vs R.Natarajan

Gouthamraj Vs Punithavathi

Tamilselvan Vs Anu Soundarya

Thomas Jacob Vs G.Anwar Badsha

P.Saradha Vs Mr.a.Devadoss