Allowed

P.S. Khaleel v. N. Hansardeen

Madras HC21 Dec 2020CRP/2466/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This revision petition was filed to restore a Revision Civil Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. The High Court set aside the lower court's order and allowed the appeal to proceed on merits upon payment of costs, directing disposal within three months.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order is set aside; the IA is allowed on payment of Rs.1,000 costs to Legal Aid Services Authority; RCA directed to be disposed of on merits within three months.

P.S. Khaleel Vs N. Hansardeen — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRP(NPD)No.2466 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

RESERVED ON : 16.12.2020 PRONOUNCED ON : 21.12.2020

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN

¶6

CRP(NPD)No.2466 of 2016
(Through Video Conferencing)
P.S.Khaleel Petitioner
Vs
N.Hansardeen Respondent

¶7

Prayer:- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, under Section 25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, to set aside the fair and final order dated 22.12.2015 made in IA.No.3 of 2013 in RCA.No.9 of 2012, by the Rent Control Appellate Authority cum Subordinate Judge, Nilgiris, Udhagamandalam.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.Sriram For Respondent : No Appearance (Party in Person) ORDER

¶9

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, to set aside the fair and final order dated 22.12.2015 made in IA.No.3 of 2013 in RCA.No.9 of 2012, by the Rent Control Appellate Authority cum Subordinate Judge, Nilgiris, Udhagamandalam.

¶10

The facts of the case, in a nutshell, are that the tenant is the Petitioner and the landlord is the Respondent. RCOP.No.37 Plaintiff 2007 was filed for

¶11

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶12

1/4

¶13

CRP(NPD)No.2466 of 2016

¶14

eviction on the ground of wilful default and own use and occupation and the RCOP was allowed 5.3.2012. As against the same, RCA.No.9 of 2012 was filed by the tenant. The said appeal was dismissed for non prosecution on 05.12.2012. The present IA was filed to restore the RCA. Since the said IA was dismissed by the impugned order, this Civil Revision Petition has been

¶15

filed.

¶16

This court heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and also carefully perused the materials placed on record.

¶17

According to the Petitioner, since he was suffering from acute Bronchitis and severe fever, he was under treatment from 02.12.2012 and his counsel was not able to appear on 05.12.2012 as he had to attend a funeral, but without considering the same, the court below erred in rejecting the claim of the Petitioner.

¶18

The RCA was dismissed for non prosecution on 5.12.2012 and the application to set aside the same and to restore the RCA was filed on 2.1.2013. In order to meet the ends of justice and to give one more opportunity, the tenant may be permitted to pursue the case on payment costs.

¶19

In fine, this Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The impugned order, dated 22.12.2015 made in IA.No.3 of 2013 in RCA.No.9 of 2012, by the Rent Control Appellate Authority cum Subordinate Judge, Nilgiris, Udhagamandalam. is set aside and said IA is allowed on payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees one thousand only) to the Taluk Level Legal Aid

¶20

2/4 http://www.judis.nic.in

¶21

CRP(NPD)No.2466 of 2016

¶22

Services Authority, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Rent Control Appellate Authority is directed to dispose of the RCA, on merits and in accordance with law, within three months thereafter. No costs.

¶23

21.12.2020
Index:Yes/No
Web:Yes/No
Speaking/Non Speaking
Srcm
To
1. The Rent Control Appellate Authority cum Subordinate Judge, Nilgiris,
Udhagamandalam.

¶24

3/4 http://www.judis.nic.in

¶25

CRP(NPD)No.2466 of 2016

¶26

A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.

¶27

Srcm

¶28

Pre-Delivery Order in
CRP(NPD)No.2466 of 2016
21.12.2020

¶29

4/4 http://www.judis.nic.in

P.S. Khaleel v. N. Hansardeen

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.S. Khaleel v. N. Hansardeen

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Chandran Vs N.Damodaran

S.Thirunavukarasu Vs Thiruvannamalai Gandhi Nagar

N.V. Chakrapani Vs M/S Rapajawasa Finance Mart

Chandramathi Vs Vaduvammal

R. Seenu Vs N. Porkodi

K.Srinivasa Reddy Vs Jagannatha Reddy