R. Seenu v. N. Porkodi
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution to set aside a fair and decretal order. The petitioner was absent on the day of hearing. The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2391 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2391 of 2016
(Through Video Conferencing)
R.Seenu .. Petitioner
Vs.
N.Porkodi .. Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the impugned Fair and Decreetal Order dated 11.04.2016 passed in E.P.No.46 of 2011 in I.A.No.2653 of 2010 in O.P.No.1036 of 2003 on the file of the III Additional Family Court, Chennai.
For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondent : Ms.Kamatchi
ORDER
When the case was taken up for hearing on 18.12.2020, there was
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition under Article 227 must be dismissed for non-prosecution when there is no representation by the petitioner?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.Seenu
- respondent
N.Porkodi
Coram
A.A.Nakkiran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court