P.Sree Saranya v. R.Balakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order in C.R.P. and C.M.P. challenging family court orders under Article 226. Court issued notice, permitted private notice, and granted interim stay.
What did the court decide?
Notice issued; private notice permitted; interim stay granted.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Third day of July Two Thousand Nineteen
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
CRP.No.2117 of 2019
and CMP.No.13670 of 2019
MRS.P.SREE SARANYA [ PETITIONER IN BOTH THE PETITIONS ]
MR.R.BALAKUMAR [ RESPONDENT IN BOTH THE PETITIONS ]
Petitions under Article 227, constitution of India, filed against the order and decreetal order passed in IA.NO.4607/2018 in OP.No.3184 of 2017 on the file of the IVth Additional Principal Judge, Family Court at Chennai dated 06-12-2018(in CRP.No.2117/2019) and
(ii) Stay of all further proceedings inOP NO.3184 of 2017 pending on the file of Learned IV Additional Principal Judge Family Court at Chennai (in CMP.No.13670/2019) pending disposal of the above CRP.PD.No.2117/2019 respectively.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whethernotice shouldbe issuedin theWRP underArticle227of theConstitution
Whether thecourt should extendaninterimstay
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mrs. P. Saranya
- respondent
Mr. R. Balakumar
Coram
M.M. Govindaraj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court