Kumar v. Venkatesan
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order condoning five days delay in filing a Civil Revision Petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act after hearing, thereby listing the CRP for admission.
What did the court decide?
Delay of five days in preferring the Civil Revision Petition was condoned and the CRP was posted for admission.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.2887 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.07.2020
C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M. GOVINDARAJ
C.M.P No.2887 of 2018
in C.R.P (NPD) SR.No.11026 of 2018
Kumar ... Petitioner
Vs.
Venkatesan ... Respondent
PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of five days in preferring the above Civil Revision Petition.
For Petitioner : M/s. R.Krishnaswamy For Respondent : M/s.Tatva Legal Chennai - - - - -
1/2
C.M.P.No.2887 of 2018
M.GOVINDARAJ, J.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of five days in preferring Civil Revision Petition is condonable under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kumar
- respondent
Venkatesan
Coram
M. GOVINDARAJ
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court