Krishnan v. Ganesan
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the execution proceedings had settled the entire amount in question.
What the court decided
CRP(NPD)No.1620 of 2016
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
CRP(NPD)No.1620 of 2016 CMP.No.8766 of 2016
Krishnan Petitioner
Vs
Ganesan Respondent Prayer:- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed, under Section 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order made in IA.No.258 of 2015 in OS.No.8 of 2011, dated 16.03.2016, by the Subordinate Court at Arni, Tiruvannamalai.
For Petitioner : Mr.AK.Rajaraman For Respondent : Mr.Gunaseelan ORDER
The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that since the
entire amount in question has been settled in the execution proceedings, the matter has become infructuous and accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition may be dismissed, as infructuous. In view of the same, recording the said submissions of the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected MP is closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Krishnan
- respondent
Ganesan
Coram
A.A.Nakkiran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court