Disposed

Anand @ Babu v. the President

Madras HC20 Aug 2020CRP/1484/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order in Civil Revision Petitions directed the District Munsif to dispose of an interlocutory application within one month after resuming physical hearings, addressing threats of dispossession faced by the petitioners regarding suit property possession.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Trial Court to dispose of I.A.No.2 of 2020 within one month of resumption of physical hearing.

Anand @ Babu Vs the President — Property and Title | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRP (PD) Nos.1484 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 20.08.2020

¶4

C O R A M

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M. GOVINDARAJ

¶6

C.R.P (PD) No.1484 of 2020
1.Anand @ Babu
S/o.Late D.V.Ramasamappa
2.Srinivasaiah
S/o.Late D.V.Ramasamappa
3.Gopal
S/o.D.V.Ramasamappa
4.Aswathamma
W/o.D.R.Sathyanarayana ... Petitioners
Vs.
The President,
Bagalur Panchayath,
Bagalur,
Hosur Taluk,
Kirshnagiri District. ... Respondent

¶7

Prayer : Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the District Munsif, Hosur, Krishnagiri to dispose of the I.A.No.2 of 2020 in O.S.No.35 of 2020 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Hosur, Krishnagiri within the stipulated time as specified by this Court and in the interregnum restrain the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioners in respect of the suit property.

¶8

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶9

1/4

¶10

CRP (PD) Nos.1484 of 2020

¶11

For Petitioners : Mr.I.Paranthaman For Respondent : Mr.Devnarenderan

¶12

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

Mr.Devnarenderan, learned counsel entered appearance on behalf of the respondent.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the plaintiffs are facing threat of deposession against the President of Bagalur Panchayath. The interlocutory application is kept pending by the Trial Court for no reason. Now, the petitioner is before this Court for early disposal of I.A.No.2 of 2020. Mr.Dev Narendaran, learned counsel for respondent submits that the respondent has not indulged in any illegal action.

¶16

3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, a direction is

¶17

given to the Trial Court to dispose of I.A.No.2 of 2020 in O.S.No.35 of 2020 on merits after giving an opportunity of hearing to both the parties within a period of one month from the date resumption of physical hearing of the Courts.

¶18

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶19

2/4

¶20

CRP (PD) Nos.1484 of 2020

¶21

With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of.

¶22

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶23

20.08.2020
Internet : Yes/No
Index : Yes / No
Speaking Order / Non-speaking Order
ms
To
1.The District Munsif,
Hosur,
Krishnagiri District.
2.The President,
Bagalur Panchayath,
Bagalur,Hosur Taluk,
Kirshnagiri District.

¶24

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶25

3/4

¶26

CRP (PD) Nos.1484 of 2020

¶27

ms/asi

¶28

M.GOVINDARAJ, J.

¶29

C.R.P.(PD) No.1484 of 2020
20.08.2020

¶30

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶31

4/4

Anand @ Babu v. the President

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand @ Babu v. the President

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajini Vs Ayyadurai

Ponnusamy Vs K.Govindaraj

M.Sarafath Ali Vs K. Mayilvaghanan

Aarti Razee Vs Mr.S.Sivagurunathan

P.Arumugam Vs Palanisamy

Mariambi Shajahan Vs Parveen Nazer