Plaintiff sought to withdraw a property suit for permanent injunction before the Madras High Court. The plaintiff appeared online to request withdrawal, and the court recorded the same, dismissing the suit as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
No order as to costs. Registry directed to refund court fee if permissible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.08.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
C.S.No.17 of 2016
and A.No.3279 of 2017
and O.A.No.28 of 2016
M.Sarafath Ali
S/o.Mohamed Hasana Lebbai ... Plaintiff
Vs.
K.Mayilvaghanan
S/o.Kanagasundaram ... Defendant
PRAYER: Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code 1908 R/w Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules praying to pass the following judgment and decree against the defendant:-
a. for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his men, agent or person claiming through him in any manner from disturbing with the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property and in any manner interfering, preventing the plaintiff from carrying on the repair works in the suit schedule property.
b. for such other relief as this Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case.
c. for costs of the suit and justice be rendered.
2
For Plaintiff : Mr.S.Elambharathi For defendant : Mr.R.Murugesan
J U D G M E N T
Mr.S.Elambharathi, learned counsel for the plaintiff appeared
online and he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the suit.
ms/asi
3
M.GOVINDARAJ, J.
ms/asi
C.S.No.17 of 2016
and A.No.3279 of 2017
and O.A.No.28 of 2016
19.08.2020
M. Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
