Disposed

Rajendhiran v. Prushothaman

Madras HC12 Aug 2020CRP/1448/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This revision petition concerning the appointment of a Surveyor to assist the Advocate Commissioner was disposed of without interference. The Court allowed the petitioner's objection regarding escalated costs but directed the Trial Court to frame a suitable order for sharing expenses.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the Trial Court to pass suitable orders regarding sharing of expenses for engaging the Surveyor by both parties.

Rajendhiran Vs Prushothaman — Property and Title | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRP (PD) NO.1448 OF 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 12.08.2020

¶4

C O R A M

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M. GOVINDARAJ

¶6

CRP (PD) NO.1448 OF 2020
AND CMP NO.8347 OF 2020
Rajendhiran ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Purushothaman
2.Sagundhala
3.Assistant Divisional Engineer
(Operation and Maintenance)
Kallakurichi.
4.Junior Engineer
(Operation and Maintenance)
Kallakurichi.
5.Divisional Engineer
(Operation and Maintenance)
Kallakurichi. ... Respondents

¶7

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decree passed in I.A.No.1226 of 2019 in O.S.NO.240 of 2013 dated 22.01.2020 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi,

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sunilkumar

¶9

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶10

CRP (PD) NO.1448 OF 2020

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated

¶13

22.01.2020 passed in I.A.No.1226 of 2019 in O.S.NO.240 of 2013 by the First Additional District Munsif Court, Kallakurichi,

¶14

The revision petitioner has objections for appointment of Surveyor to assist the Advocate Commissioner as it will escalate the cost. Hence, the order passed by the Court below need not be interfered. Since the respondent in I.A.No.1226 of 2019 is also insisting for engaging the Surveyor, it is reasonable that he also shares the expenses.

¶15

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for

¶16

the petitioner, a direction is given to the Trial Court to pass suitable orders with regard to sharing of the expenses in engaging the Surveyor by both the parties.

¶17

With this observation, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

12.08.2020

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶22

CRP (PD) NO.1448 OF 2020

¶23

The I Additional District Munsif Kallakurichi.

¶24

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶25

CRP (PD) NO.1448 OF 2020

¶26

M.GOVINDARAJ, J.

¶27

¶28

CRP (PD) NO.1448 OF 2020

¶29

12.08.2020

¶30

http://www.judis.nic.in

Rajendhiran v. Prushothaman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendhiran v. Prushothaman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Zufia Sulthana Vs a.Thousif Ahamed

The Manage of Coimbatore District Vs K.N.Murugesan

A Mohamed Ubaidullah Vs A.G. Uvaiz

N.Baskar Vs J.Arun Prakash

Shantha Devi Vs D.Purushothaman

M/S.Vaishnavi Engineers Vs M.Arumugham