Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition as infructuous, relying on counsel's submission that the underlying suit was already dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD).No.1304 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.1304 of 2016
(Through Video Conferencing)
R.Murugesan .. Petitioner
Vs.
Ramasamy @ M.Annamalai .. Respondent
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set
aside the fair and final order dated 20.01.2016 made in I.A.No.1105 of 2015
in O.S.No.180 of 2015 on the file of the Ist Additional District Court,
Tirupur.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.S.Saravanan
For Respondent : No appearance
ORDER
The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that since the suit in O.S.No.180 of 2015 had already been dismissed for default on 11.12.2019, this Civil Revision Petition may be dismissed, as infructuous.
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
1/2
C.R.P.(PD).No.1304 of 2016
arb
In view of the same, recording the said submission of the learned counsel
for the Petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
No costs.
17.12.2020
arb
Internet: Yes/No
Index:Yes/No
To
The Ist Additional District Court,
Tirupur.
C.R.P.(PD).No.1304 of 2016
2/2
R.Murugesan
Ramasamy @ M.Annamalai
A.A.Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
