This disposal allows a Civil Revision Petition under Article 226/227 as infructuous on the ground that the underlying petition had already been disposed of by the assignment judge.
Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous, no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD).No.856 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.A.NAKKIRAN
C.R.P.(PD).No.856 of 2016
(Through Video Conferencing)
Lakshmanan Noarayanan .. Petitioner Vs. Sindhu @ Chinthamani .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the 1st Additional Family Court, Chennai to dispose of the petition in O.P.No.1299 of 2013 within a reasonable period. For Petitioner : Ms.AL.Ganthimathi For Respondent : No appearance
ORDER
The learned counsel for the Petitioner has submitted that since the original petition in O.P.No.1299 of 2013 had already been disposed of, nothing survives and hence this Civil Revision Petition may be dismissed, as infructuous. In view of the same, recording the said submission of the
A.A.NAKKIRAN, J.
1/2
C.R.P.(PD).No.856 of 2016
arb
learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed,
as infructuous. No costs.
16.12.2020
arb
Internet: Yes/No
Index:Yes/No
To
The 1 st Additional Family Court,
Chennai.
C.R.P.(PD).No.856 of 2016
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Civil Revision Petition seeking directions to dispose of a petition that has already been disposed of is infructuous.
Lakshmanan Noarayanan
Sindhu @ Chinthamani
A. A. Nakkiran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
