Revathi v. Rajendran
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petitions against orders of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal were dismissed as infructuous on the petitioners' submission, with respondents given up. No costs awarded.
What did the court decide?
All three civil revision petitions were dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.R.P.Nos. 1205, 1206 & 1207 of 2018
Revathi ...Petitioner in C.R.P.No. 1205 of 2018
Rajsekaran ...Petitioner in C.R.P.No. 1206 of 2018
Indumathi ...Petitioner in C.R.P.No. 1207 of 2018
Vs.
1.Rajendran
2.The Manager,
Shriram General Insurance Co.Ltd,
C-135-A, 3 rd Floor, 5 th Cross,
Thillai Nagar, Trichy.
3.Navaneethakrishnan
4.The United India Insurance Company Ltd,
Venkadeshwara Shopping Complex,
No.100, Southkar Street, Chidambaram. ...Respondents in all CRPs'
(R1 & R3 GIVEN UP EXPARTE, BELOW THE LOWER COURT
Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal orders dated 05.10.2017 made in I.A.No. 611, 612 & 613 of 2017 in MCOP.No. 19 of 2011 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal District Court) Ariyalur.
For Petitioners in all CRPs' : Ms.J.Prithivi For Respondents in all CRPs' : Mr.S.Dakshinamoorthy for R2 Mr.J.Chandran for R4 R1 & R3 – Given up
C O M M O N O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Revathi
- petitioner
Rajsekaran
- petitioner
Indumathi
- respondent
Rajendran
- respondent
The Manager, Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court