Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226/227 to set aside an order of the 13th Small Causes Court was dismissed as the matter was settled out of court between the parties.
Nothing survives in the Civil Revision Petition as the dispute is settled out of court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2673 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.15912 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.12.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2673 of 2018
and
C.M.P.No.15912 of 2018
Chennai - 600 001.
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, pleased to set aside the order of the learned Judge of the 13th Small Causes Court, Chennai passed in E.P.No.299 of 2018 in R.C.O.P.No.1683 of 2015 dated 01.08.2018.
1/4
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2673 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.15912 of 2018
For Petitioners : Mr.J.Antony Jesus
For Respondent : Mr.K.Venkateswaran
for R1 & R2.
Mr.S.A.Jegan
for R3 to R5.
ORDER
Both the counsels state that the matter has been settled out of
Court between the parties.
Petition. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as settled out of
Court. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
02.12.2020
kmm
Internet: Yes/No Index:Yes/No
2/4
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2673 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.15912 of 2018
To
The 13th Small Causes Court, Chennai.
3/4
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2673 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.15912 of 2018
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
kmm
C.R.P.(NPD).No.2673 of 2018
and
C.M.P.No.15912 of 2018
02.12.2020
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to set aside the order of the 13th Small Causes Court in E.P.No.299 of 2018.
Mrs. Manju Gupta
Bansidhar Gupta
Kamlesh V. Mehta
Nilesh V. Mehta
M/s. Agarwal Bhavan A Partnership Firm
G.Nirmal Kumar
R.Subramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
