This judgment dismissed a criminal revision petition in private nuisance proceedings. The Court closed the matter because a subsequent order already allowed the status quo following the firm obtaining necessary permissions.
The Criminal Revision Case and connected miscellaneous petition were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.187 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 04.08.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.187 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.2632 of 2016
The Sub Divisional Magistrate and
Sub Collector, O/o. The Sub Collector, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli.
.. Respondent/Respondent
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 12.03.2016 made in No.A4/11920/15 on the file of the respondent and set aside the same.
For Petitioners : M/s.T.Lajapathi Roy For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl. side)
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioners are the Director of Lax Bio Feeds Pvt. Ltd., Tirunelveli District. The respondent herein, namely, the Sub Divisional Magistrate and Sub Collector, Cheranmahadevi, invoking Section 133 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1/2
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.187 of 2016
of Cr.P.C. issued Form 20-Order for the removal of nuisances cum Show cause notice, on 12.03.2016, as against the concern of the revision petitioners, against which, the present revision case has been filed. Pending this petition, another proceedings was initiated as against the concern of the revision petitioners in Na.Ka.A1/12172/2018, on 09.01.2019 and the same was challenged before this Court in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.30 of 2019. This Court, vide order dated 12.04.2019, allowed the same, by taking into consideration of the subsequent development of the concern, namely, Lax Bio Feeds Pvt. Ltd., obtaining necessary permission from concerned authorities. In view of the issue having been decided by this Court in Crl.R.C.(MD)No.30 of 2019, on the subsequent proceedings initiated by the respondent, this impugned order has become infructuous.
Assistant Registrar(Records)
// True Copy //
ogy
Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To
The Sub Divisional Magistrate and Sub Collector, O/o. The Sub Collector, Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli.
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.187 of 2016 04.08.2020
DB(CO) TR(02.09.2020) 2P 2C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to close the criminal revision case as the impugned order became infructuous.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.30 of 2019Explained¶18
2 provisions across 1 enactments
J.R.Thomas Xavier and S.Louis Andro Balan
Sub Divisional Magistrate and Sub Collector, Cheranmahadevi
B. Pugalendhi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
