K.Saravanan v. B.Deepadevi
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismissed the criminal revision filed by a husband against an ex parte maintenance order. The court relied on a petitioner's memo indicating his disinterest in pursuing the matter.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Revision Case No. 11 of 2019 and connected miscellaneous petition dismissed. Ex parte order remains.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.02.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
Crl.R.C.No.11 of 2019 and
Crl.M.P.No.75 of 2019
K.Saravanan
B.Deepadevi
... Petitioner
Vs.
... Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 r/w 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to call for the records in M.C.No.263 of 2018 on the file of the learned VI Additional Family Judge, Chennai and to set aside the exparte order dated 12.12.2018.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.Mohammed Aarif
O R D E R
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to set aside the ex parte maintenance order due to the petitioner's lack of appearance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Saravanan
- respondent
B. Deepadevi
Coram
R. Mahadevan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court