P.Murthy v. G.Ganesan
Case brief
What is this about?
This complaint order records the closure of a contempt petition. Counsel for respondents submitted compliance with the impugned order, a concession by petitioner's counsel, and an evidence document. Recording submissions, the court closed the petition.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.63 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.02.2020
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
Contempt Petition No.63 of 2020
P.Murthy ... Petitioner
-vs-
1.G.Ganesan
The Managing Director
Metropolitan Transport
Corporation (Chennai) Ltd.,
Pallavan Illam
Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002
2.K.Bama
The Administrator
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation
Employees Pension Fund Trust
Pallavan Salai
Chennai 600 002 ... Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempts of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for having committed contempt by willful disobedience of the order of this Court made in Writ Petition No.1956 of 2019 dated 30.01.2019.
For Petitioner :: Mr.S.T.Varadarajulu For Respondents :: Mr.K.Moorthy
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Murthy
- respondent
G.Ganesan
- respondent
K.Bama
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court