Allowed

P. Mariselvam v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC23 Jan 2020CRL OP(MD)/940/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in respect of offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) IPC. The petitioner was directed to execute a bond with two sureties, appear for interrogation, and appear before the Magistrate within 15 days or the petition would stand dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to bond, sureties, appearance for interrogation, compliance with Section 438 Cr.P.C., and appearance before Magistrate within 15 days.

P. Mariselvam Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.940 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 23/01/2020

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.940 of 2020

¶8

P.Mariselvam

¶9

... Petitioner/Accused No.1

¶10

¶11

The Inspector of Police, Kalugumalai Police Station, Tuticorin District. (Crime No.188 of 2019)

¶12

... Respondent/Complainant

¶13

For Petitioner : M/s.A.Joseph Jerry, Advocate.

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶15

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶16

PRAYER :-

¶17

for Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.188 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police.

¶18

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶19

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶20

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No.188 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶21

Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Kovilpatti, Thuthukudi District, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the

¶22

1/2

¶23

CRL OP(MD). No.940 of 2020

¶24

petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.

¶25

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶26

sd/23/01/2020 / TRUE COPY /

¶27

/ /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶28

Madurai - 625 023.

¶29

¶30

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.2, KOVILPATTI, THUTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

¶31

DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THUTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

¶32

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALUGUMALAI POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

¶33

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

¶34

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶35

+1 CC to M/s.A.JOSEPH JENY, Advocate ( SR-1382[I] dated 24/01/2020 )

¶36

ORDER

¶37

¶38

CRL OP(MD) No.940 of 2020 Date :23/01/2020 MS/PN/SAR-4/28.01.2020/2P.6C

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶40

2/2

P. Mariselvam v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Mariselvam v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Justin Babu Vs the Inspector of Police

Jeevarathinabai Vs the Superintendent of Police

Abdul Gafoor Vs The Inspector of Police

M. Vignesh Vs The Inspector of Police

P.K.M. LIyakath Ali Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Police

Jeyakumar@Shiek Vs The Inspector of Police