Allowed

Pilominal v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC18 Aug 2020CRL OP(MD)/8454/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to a 67-year-old petitioner facing charges under sections 498(A), 494, and 506(i) IPC. The order stipulated conditions including appearance, execution of a bond with sureties, and prompt appearance for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest subject to conditions including appearance before the court within 15 days and execution of a bond with two sureties.

Pilominal Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.8454 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18/08/2020

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD). No.8454 of 2020

¶6

Pilominal ... Petitioner/A3

¶7

¶8

The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Fort.Trichy City. Crime No.14/2018. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr. A.R.Kannappan Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶9

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶10

PRAYER :-

¶11

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.14 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police.

¶12

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶13

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶14

Though this Court already granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner herein, the petitioner could not avail the same on account of the reasons mentioned in the petition. Hence, the earlier order got itself worked out and the petitioner is constrained to file this second petition.

¶15

The petitioner herein is aged about 67 years. The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences under sections 498(A), 494 and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.14 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶16

I am of the view that arresting the petitioner would not serve any purpose. Hence, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, petitioner https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/2

¶18

CRL OP(MD). No.8454 of 2020

¶19

is ordered to be released on bail in the the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Trichy, and on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.

¶20

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/-

18/08/2020

/ TRUE COPY /

/ /2020

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶27

¶28

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ADDITIONAL MAHILA COURT, TRICHY.

¶29

2.DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.

¶30

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, FORT. TRICHY CITY.

¶31

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶32

ORDER

¶33

¶34

CRL OP(MD) No.8454 of 2020 Date :18/08/2020

¶35

¶36

AE/PN/SAR-III (21.08.2020) 2P 5C

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶38

2/2

Pilominal v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pilominal v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Mohandass, Vs a.Nirmala Mary

M. Manthiramoorthy Vs the Chairman

G. Vijayakumar Vs the Asst.Director

The Inspector of Police Vs K.Varadharajan

P. Kaliyuganathan Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Rayan @ Rajan @ Godwinraj Vs The Sub Inspector of Police