Allowed

The Inspector of Police v. K.Varadharajan

Madras HC18 Aug 2020CRL MP(MD)/3788/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to extend the time frame for completing the investigation and filing the charge sheet was allowed for eight more weeks, but the court clarified that no further extensions would be granted.

What did the court decide?

Extension of the investigation period by eight weeks was granted; the petition to extend the time frame for completing the investigation and filing the charge sheet was allowed.

The Inspector of Police Vs K.Varadharajan — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Criminal Jurisdiction

¶2

Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of August Two Thousand Twenty

¶3

PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL MP(MD). No.3788 of 2020 in CRL.OP (MD)No.15883 of 2016

¶4

The Inspector of Police Soolakarai Police Station Virudhunagar District. (Cr.No. 124 of 2015. ... Petitioner/4^th Respondent Vs

¶5

1 K.Varadharajan ...1^st Respondent/Petitioner

¶6

2 The Superintendent of Police Virudhunagar District Virudhunagar.

¶7

3 The Deputy Superintendent Of Police CBCID Madurai Range Madurai City.

¶8

4 The Deputy Superintendent Of Police Virudhunagar District Virudhunagar.

¶9

... 2 to 4 Respondents/Respondents

¶10

Prayer :- This petition filed under section 482 of Cr.P.C. to pass an order extending the time frame fixed in the order dt.13.2.2020 made in Crl.OP(MD).No.15883 of 2016 to further period to complete the Investigation in Cr.No.124/2015 of Soolakarai Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

¶11

Prayer in Crl OP(MD) No.15883 /2016

¶12

Petition filed under section 482 Code of Cr.P.C. To transfer the investigation in Crime No.124 of 2015 on the file of the fourth responden t to the second respondent investigating agency and direct them to complete the investigation and file a final report within the stipulated period.

¶13

ORDER:- This Petition coming upon for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. A.Robinson , Government Advocate (Crl.Side)for the Petitioner and of Ms. G.Marimuthu, Advocate for the first respondent, this Court made the following order:

¶14

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶15

The investigation in this regard seeks eight more weeks to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ complete the investigation and file the charge sheet.

¶16

I make it clear that further extension of time will not be granted. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands allowed.

¶17

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶18

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶19

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶20

¶21

The Superintendent of Police Virudhunagar District Virudhunagar. 2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police CBCID Madurai Range Madurai City.

¶22

The Deputy Superintendent Of Police Virudhunagar District Virudhunagar.

¶23

The Inspector of Police Soolakarai Police Station Virudhunagar District. 5. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai Copy to: The Section Officer, Criminal Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai ORDER DATED : 18/08/2020 ========================== ORDER ========================== CRL MP(MD). No.3788 of 2020 in Crl OP(MD)15883 of 2016 Giving direction and etc. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ as stated within. AP(26/08/2020) 2P 8C

The Inspector of Police v. K.Varadharajan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Inspector of Police v. K.Varadharajan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.Mohandass, Vs a.Nirmala Mary

M. Manthiramoorthy Vs the Chairman

G. Vijayakumar Vs the Asst.Director

P. Kaliyuganathan Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

Rayan @ Rajan @ Godwinraj Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Pilominal Vs The Inspector of Police