Allowed

S.Shanmugam v. The Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC30 Jan 2020CRL OP(MD)/665/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in CRL OP(MD). No. 665 of 2020. Conditions included execution of a bond, appearance before police for interrogation, and appearance before the concerned Magistrate within 15 days.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon executing a bond with sureties and complying with conditions of appearing before police and Magistrate.

S.Shanmugam Vs The Sub Inspector of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.665 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 30/01/2020

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD). No.665 of 2020

¶7

S.SHANMUGAM, ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 VS

¶8

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT. CRIME NO.15 OF 2019. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : M/s.T.A.Punithan, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶10

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶11

PRAYER :-

¶12

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.15 of 2019 on the file of the Respondent Police

¶13

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶14

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶15

The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 465, 468, 471 and 420 of I.P.C., in Crime No. 15 of 2019 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶16

The case of the defacto complainant is that the petitioner had availed loan by creating fake loan account. But then, the learned counsel for the petitoner states that all the accounts have since been closed and the liabilities have been cleared. It is the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ bank which has declined to release the pledged items.

¶17

1/2

¶18

CRL OP(MD). No.665 of 2020

¶19

However, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.II, Pudukottai, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.

¶20

The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶21

/ TRUE COPY /

¶22

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, PUDUKOTTAI.

¶25

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI.

¶26

3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶27

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶28

+1 CC to M/s.T.A.PUNITHAN, Advocate ( SR-1941[I] dated 30/01/2020 )

¶29

PNN

¶30

JM/VR/SAR 3/10.02.2020/2P/6C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2/2

S.Shanmugam v. The Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Shanmugam v. The Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Immanuvel Vs The Inspector of Police

Thangadurai Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

Nathiya Vs The Inspector of Police

Abdul Nazar Vs The Inspector of Police

M. Jeyabalachandran(Died),Dr.J.Madhan, Vs The Inspector of Police

Raveendran Vs The Inspector of Police