Dismissed

P.Suresh v. The Commissioner of Police

Madras HC20 Mar 2020CRL OP(MD)/5012/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a direction to prevent police intervention in a commercial dispute. The court directed respondents not to intervene under the guise of enquiry but to allow the enquiry with necessary cooperation from the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed not to intervene in the commercial dispute without following legal procedure; petitioner directed to furnish materials for the enquiry.

P.Suresh Vs The Commissioner of Police — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Crl.O.P.[MD]No.5012 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.03.2020

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI CRL.O.P(MD)No.5012 of 2020

P.Suresh

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

¶9

The Inspector of Police, Keeraidurai Police Station, Madurai, Madurai District.

¶10

M.Kannan ... Respondents

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to direct the respondent nos.1 & 2 not to intervene the commercial dispute between the petitioner and third respondent under the guise of enquiry without following the procedure established by law.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Krishnan For RR 1 & 2 : Mrs.S.Bharathi, Government Advocate [Crl. Side]

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking for a direction to direct the first and second respondents not to intervene the commercial dispute between the petitioner and third respondent under the guise of enquiry without following the procedure established by law.

¶15

The learned Government Advocate [Crl. Side] would submit that it is purely a commercial transaction and the respondent police is in need of certain materials to complete the investigation. Further, the respondent police undertakes not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. It is further submitted that C.S.R.No.41 of 2020 has been assigned and summons has been issued on 27.02.2020 to appear on 06.03.2020 for enquiry but the petitioner has not cooperated for the same.

¶16

In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent nos.1 & 2 not to intervene the commercial dispute between the petitioner and third https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/2

¶18

Crl.O.P.[MD]No.5012 of 2020

¶19

respondent. Further, the petitioner is also directed to furnish the relevant materials enabling the respondent police to expeditiously complete the enquiry.

¶20

Sd/Assistant Registrar (Crl Side) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) sts To 1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Keeraidurai Police Station, Madurai, Madurai District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.S.KRISHNAN, Advocate ( SR-12632[F] dated 20/03/2020 ) CRL.O.P(MD)No.5012 of 2020 Dated: 20.03.2020 KK(08.06.2020) 2P 5C

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

2/2

P.Suresh v. The Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Suresh v. The Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd., Vs The Inspector of Police

M.Amirtharaj Vs The Superintendent of police

J.Selvaraj Vs The Superintendent of police

M. Ramaiah Vs The Deputy Superintendent of Police

R.Amsavalli Vs The Superintendent of Police

Muthu Vs The Superintendent of police