Disposed

J.Selvaraj v. The Superintendent of police

Madras HC19 Mar 2020CRL OP(MD)/4930/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal compilation matter, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court disposed of a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., directing the law enforcing agency to consider a representation for police protection during the survey of properties.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondents to consider the petitioners' representation dated 17.02.2020 and ensure the survey is conducted by the survey department.

J.Selvaraj Vs The Superintendent of police — Property and Title | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Crl.O.P.[MD]No.4930 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.03.2020 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI CRL.O.P[MD]No.4930 of 2020

¶4

1.J.Selvaraj

¶5

2.Pouline Mary

¶6

3.Panistephen

¶7

4.S.Sundar

5.S.Sahaya Anthony

... Petitioners

Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police,

¶12

Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶13

2.The Inspector of Police, Muneerpallam Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

¶14

3.S.Esakki Konar ... Respondents

¶15

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to give adequate police protection to survey and demarcate the properties in Survey No.298 / 15 in Plot Nos.101, 102, 159, 160, 161, 162 and 163 situated at Thiyagi viswanathadhass Colony, Ittari Village, Melapalayam Sub-Registrar Office, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District based on the petitioners' representation dated 17.02.2020. For Petitioners : Mr.J.David Ganesan

¶16

For Respondents 1&2 : Mrs.S.Bharathi,

¶17

Government Advocate [Crl. Side]

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

This petition is filed for a direction to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to give adequate police protection to survey and demarcate the properties in Survey No.298 / 15 in Plot Nos.101, 102, 159, 160, 161, 162 and 163 situated at Thiyagi viswanathadhass Colony, Ittari Village, Melapalayam Sub-Registrar Office, Palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District based on the petitioners' representation dated 17.02.2020.

¶20

2.The petitioners are the owners of the properties in the above survey numbers and already they have filed a petition to survey the land. When the surveyor came to the spot, the third respondent prevented the surveyor from measuring the property. Hence, the petitioners made a representation on 17.02.2020 to the respondents 1 and 2. But, till date no action has been taken and hence, the petitioners have come up with the present petition.

¶21

3.The learned Government Advocate [Crl. Side] appearing for the State would submit that if the petitioners have made a request for https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

1/2

¶23

Crl.O.P.[MD]No.4930 of 2020

¶24

surveying the land, adequate police protection will be granted if the situation warrants.

¶25

4.In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners' representation dated 17.02.2020. Further, the law enforcing agency shall ensure the survey conducted by the survey department.

¶26

Sd/Assistant Registrar (records)

¶27

// True Copy //

¶28

/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) MR To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District,Tirunelveli.

¶29

2.The Inspector of Police, Muneerpallam Police Station, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1 CC to M/s.J.DEVID GANESAN, Advocate ( SR-12558[F] dated 19/03/2020 )

¶30

CRL.O.P[MD]No.4930 of 2020 19.03.2020 KB(23.06.2020) 2P 5C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶32

2/2

J.Selvaraj v. The Superintendent of police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.Selvaraj v. The Superintendent of police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devadasan Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Krishnan @ Duraipandi Vs The Inspector of Police

Ram Mohandoss Gandhi Vs The Additional Deputy Superintendent of Police

The Lakshmi Vilas Bank Ltd., Vs The Inspector of Police

M.Amirtharaj Vs The Superintendent of police

Chandrasekar Vs The Commissioner of Police