Allowed

R.Muthu v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC29 Jan 2020CRL OP(MD)/1450/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court entertained a petition for anticipatory bail filed by several accused persons. The court granted relief subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners granted anticipatory bail conditioned upon appearing before the Magistrate within 15 days, executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, and complying with police interrogation.

R.Muthu Vs The Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.1450 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Date : 29/01/2020

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD). No.1450 of 2020

¶7

R.Muthu 2. S.Saravanamuthu 3. K.Soalai Saravanan 4. K.Selakumar ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4

¶8

¶9

State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Kariapatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District Cr No.28/2020.

¶10

... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

For Petitioners : M/s.R.Kannan, Advocate.

¶12

For Respondent : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶14

PRAYER :- For Anticipatory bail in Crime No.28 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

¶15

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶16

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶17

The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 294(b), 448, 427, 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., r/w Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.28 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶18

Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released

¶19

1/2

¶20

CRL OP(MD). No.1450 of 2020

¶21

on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District, and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only)each with two common sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.

¶22

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/-

29/01/2020

/ TRUE COPY /

/ /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶27

¶28

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶29

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

¶30

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIAPATTI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT

¶31

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

¶32

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶33

+1. CC to M/S.R.KANNAN Advocate SR.No.1781

¶34

ORDER

¶35

¶36

CRL OP(MD) No.1450 of 2020 Date :29/01/2020

¶37

JMN/SKN/SAR-3 (03.02.2020) 2P : 6C

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶39

2/2

R.Muthu v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Muthu v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Wooltop Design P.Ltd Vs M/S. Inovativ Dezines

Mahadevan Vs Ansari Estate Pvt. Limited

Mr.B.Pradeep Vs Kross Entertainment Llc and Another

Mphamed Aboobacker Chank Lungi Ltd. Vs M/S.Exhibition Society Ltd.

K.v.Venkatraju Vs M.Koteswara Raju

M/s. Agarwal Vs M/s.Ind Barath Thermal Power Ltd.