Allowed
K.v.Venkatraju v. M.Koteswara Raju
Madras HCA/9092/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2019 in C.S.No.670 of 2019 A.No. 9092 of…
What did the court decide?
Attachment Before Judgement is ordered.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
A.No. 9092 of 2019 in C.S.No.670 of 2019
¶2
A.No. 9092 of 2019 in
¶3
C.S.No.670 of 2019
¶4
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
¶5
This Court by an order dated 29.01.2020 after hearing the learned counsel on either side, directed the respondent/defendant to furnish valuable security worth of Rs.20,00,000/- which is the liability as against the disputed claim of Rs.82,00,000/- and granted time till 27.02.2020 failing which the Attachment Before Judgement will be ordered.
¶6
- When the matter is called today, the respondent seeks time to furnish security. This Court would not see any genuine reason for seeking extension of time and therefore, the Attachment Before Judgement is ordered.
¶7
27.02.2020
¶8
kmm
¶9
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.
¶11
A.No. 9092 of 2019 in C.S.No.670 of 2019
Coram
AI extract
Dr. G. Jayachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court