Allowed

Ravi v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC22 Oct 2020CRL OP(MD)/11893/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a land dispute case involving assault and abuse, noting no injuries were sustained, subject to conditions including reporting for interrogation and execution of a bond.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted; order to release on bail in case of arrest within 15 days on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to specific conditions.

Ravi Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.11893 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 22/10/2020

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.11893 of 2020

¶8

Ravi

¶9

... Petitioner/Accused Rank Not Known

¶10

¶11

State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Velayuthampalayam Police Station, Karur District. (Crime No.Not Known of 2020) ... Respondent/Complainant

¶12

For Petitioner : M/s.R.Mathiyalagan,

¶13

Advocate.

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.R.Seenivasan,

¶15

Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶16

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C

¶17

PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

¶18

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶19

The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(i) of IPC in crime No.Not Known of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶20

Heard both sides.

¶21

3.The case of the prosecution is that due to some land dispute, the petitioner assaulted the defacto complainant with hands and abused him in filthy language.

¶22

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and hence, he prayed for anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶23

The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) submitted that https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ no one sustained injuries in the said occurrence.

¶24

1/3

¶25

CRL OP(MD). No.11893 of 2020

¶26

6.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that no one sustained injuries in the said occurrence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶27

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶28

(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶29

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶30

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶31

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶32

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

¶33

(f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/-

22/10/2020

/ TRUE COPY /

/ /2020

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶39

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ copy,shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶40

2/3

¶41

CRL OP(MD). No.11893 of 2020

¶42

¶43

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KARUR.

¶44

DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR DISTRICT.

¶45

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VELAYUTHAMPALAYAM POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

¶46

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶47

MS/PN/SAR-3/28.10.2020/3P.5C

¶48

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶49

3/3

Ravi v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

X.Thomas Francis Vs The Additional Superintendent of Police

P.Thangakalyani, Vs the District Collector

T. Elangovan, M/45 Yrs, Vs the State Information

R.Poondi Arockiya Sekar Vs The Inspector of Police

Tamilmaran Vs The Inspector of Police

N.Arul Ashok Kumar Vs The Inspector of Police