N.Arul Ashok Kumar v. The Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding alleged offences under Sections 354 and 354(A) TAM HARASSMENT ACT. Respondent's counsel submitted the complaint was already closed. Court closed the petition without granting bail as the apprehension arose in a closed case.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail was not granted; petition was closed.
What the court decided
CRL OP(MD). No.11757 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Date : 22/10/2020
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
CRL OP(MD). No.11757 of 2020
N.Arul Ashok Kumar ... Petitioner/Accused
Rank Not Known
Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Navalpattu Police Station, Trichy District.
Crime No.Not known of 2020. ... Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sheik Abdullah,
Advocate.
For Respondent : M/s.S.E.Veronica Vincent, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail in a case where the police complaint has already been closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.Arul Ashok Kumar
- respondent
The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Navalpattu Police Station, Trichy District.
Coram
Abdul Qudhose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court