Allowed

Kathiravan @ Kathirvel v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC29 Sept 2020CRL OP(MD)/10484/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C regarding alleged illegal transportation of river sand under Section 379 IPC, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted bail upon satisfaction of conditions including depositing a bond amount and reporting to police.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail subject to execution of bond, deposit of sum, reporting, and conditions regarding evidence preservation and non-absconding.

Kathiravan @ Kathirvel Vs The Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.10484 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

CRL OP(MD). No.10484 of 2020

¶6

Kathiravan @ Kathirvel ... Petitioner/Sole Accused

¶7

The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Thiruppachethi Police Station, Sivagangai District. (In Crime No. 239 of 2020) ... Respondent/Complainant

¶8

For Petitioner : M/s.R.Senthilkumar, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.S.E. Veronica Vincent, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶9

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Section 438 of Cr.P.C

¶10

PRAYER :-

¶11

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.239 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.

¶12

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioner is a sole accused apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under section 379 of I.P.C., in Crime No.239 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner said to have illegally transported 1/2 unit of river sand. Hence, a complaint has been registered.

¶15

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/3

¶18

CRL OP(MD). No.10484 of 2020

¶19

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

¶20

5.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police.

¶21

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the quantum of sentence this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶22

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thiruppuvanam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶23

(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶24

(b)the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) to the credit of Sittar Koodam, Num Kulandhaigal Illam, 9/24, Arutpa Nagar, Kallikudi, Madurai District. (Account No.974101551807, IFSC No.CNRB0000974), within a period of two weeks without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court and the learned Judicial Magistrate, after perusing the challan/ receipt, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner;

¶25

(c)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶26

(d)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶27

(e)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶28

(f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

¶29

2/3

¶30

CRL OP(MD). No.10484 of 2020

¶31

(g)if the accused/petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

¶32

sd/29/09/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶33

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶34

TO 1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUPPUVANAM. 2. -DO- THROUGH: THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUPPACHETHI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. COPY TO: THE OFFICER IN CHARGE, SITTAR KOODAM, NUM KULANDHAIGAL ILLAM, 9/24, ARUTPA NAGAR, KALLIKUDI, MADURAI DISTRICT. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10484 of 2020 Date :29/09/2020 KSA SRS/ AKM/ SAR-II/ 05.10.2020/ 3P/6C

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

3/3

Kathiravan @ Kathirvel v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kathiravan @ Kathirvel v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.Latha Vs State Rep. by

Shahul Hameed @ Sherif Vs the State Rep. by

Anandh Vs The Inspector of Police

E.v.Jothi Vs State Rep. by

P.Santhalingam Vs State Rep.by

Karunakaran Vs State Rep.by