V.Latha v. State Rep. by
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking direction to register a Non-Bailable Case. The police submitted that the investigation into the stray complaint was closed, rendering the petition unnecessary.
What did the court decide?
Crl.O.P. stands dismissed; no direction to register the case.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.09.2020
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.O.P.No.15189 of 2020
V.Latha
...Petitioner
.Vs.
- The Commissioner of Police, Commissioner Office of Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.
- The Inspector of Police, M1, Madhavaram Police Station, Chennai 600 007. ...Respondents
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to issue a direction directing the second respondent to register the case against the petitioner's elder son Vinothkumar and his wife Imayavalli as per the CSR. No.961 of 2019 dated 22.12.2019.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Tamizavel
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police should be direction to register a Non-Bailable Case (N.B.C) under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the petitioner's son based on the complaint closure.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.Latha
- respondent
The Commissioner of Police
- respondent
The Inspector of Police
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court