Allowed

Ansari Bilal v. The Inspector of Police

Madras HC25 Sept 2020CRL OP(MD)/10364/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the Court granted bail to the petitioner, who was arrested for alleged offences involving abduction, extortion, and intimidation, subject to specific conditions including daily reporting, a bond amount, and prohibitions against tampering with witnesses or evidence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail subject to execution of a bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties, daily reporting, and conditions against tampering with witnesses or evidence.

Ansari Bilal Vs The Inspector of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.10364 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Date : 25/09/2020

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD). No.10364 of 2020

¶7

Ansari Bilal ... Petitioner/Accused No.7

¶8

State through,

¶9

The Inspector of Police, K.K.Nagar Police Station, Trichy District. In Crime No. 747 of 2020. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶10

For Petitioner : M/s.S.M.A.Jinnah, Advocate.

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

¶13

PRAYER :-

¶14

For Bail in Cr.No.747of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

¶15

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioner/A7 herein was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.09.2020 for the alleged offence under Sections 147, 342, 294(b), 323, 364(A), 506(ii) 395, 397 of IPC r/w Section 67 of the Information Technology Act

¶17

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant and one Nisha/A1 became close friends through Face book and on 04.09.2020 Nisha/A1 called him to Trichy and at the time, all the accused came in a Auto and attacked the defacto complainant and took away and demanded Rs.1 lakh and also taken photographs and threatened him. Hence, a complaint.

¶18

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that A1/Nisha got recently engaged with A2, the defacto https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/3

¶20

CRL OP(MD). No.10364 of 2020

¶21

complainant sent obscene message to A1. Hence, there was a quarrel between the defacto complainant and A1 and A2. He further the petitioner herein is falsely implicated in this case and the victim has been secured. He would also submit that A4 and A5 in this were granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD) No.9707 of 2020 on 14.09.2020 and A6 was granted bail by this Court on 24.09.2020 in Crl.O.P(MD) No.10224 of 2020.

¶22

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), appearing for the respondent police submitted that all the accused with an intention of demanding money, abducted the defacto complainant and also demanded money. He further submitted that the victim has been secured and A4 and A5 in this were granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD) No.9707 of 2020 on 14.09.2020 and A6 was granted bail by this Court on 24.09.2020 in Crl.O.P(MD) No.10224 of 2020.

¶23

Taking note of the above facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that victim has been secured and co- accused in this case were granted anticipatory bail by this Court and also taking into consideration the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

¶24

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Trichy, Trichy District.

¶25

i) the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity

¶26

ii) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m until further orders.

¶27

iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness.

¶28

iv) the petitioner shall not abscond during trial.

¶29

v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2/3

¶32

CRL OP(MD). No.10364 of 2020

¶33

vi) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

¶34

sd/25/09/2020 / TRUE COPY /

¶35

/ /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶36

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

¶37

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, TRICHY 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY 3.THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, TIRUCIRAPPALLI. 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.K.NAGAR POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT. 5.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶38

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10364 of 2020 Date :25/09/2020 aav PK/VR/SAR-2/25.09.2020 : 3P/6C

¶39

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶40

3/3

Ansari Bilal v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ansari Bilal v. The Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Narayana Samy Reddy Vs the State Rep.by

Rasu @ Ulagasamidurai Vs the State

M.K.Stalin M/47 Vs The Commissioner of Police

A.J.Jawad Vs the State Rep.by

Krishnamoorthy Vs the Commissioner of Police

Rangasamy Vs the Sub Inspector of Police