Disposed

Krishnamoorthy v. the Commissioner of Police

Madras HC25 Sept 2020CRL OP/15201/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking direction to the Commissioner of Police to decide a representation regarding police protection. The High Court directed the Commissioner to consider the representation on merits within eight weeks without going into the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Commissioner of Police to decide the petitioner's representation on merits within eight weeks.

Krishnamoorthy Vs the Commissioner of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 25.09.2020

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.15201 of 2020

¶6

Krishnamoorthy, M/A 35 years, S/o.Aathimoolam, No.3A, New Magazinepuram, Vysarpadi, Chennai – 39. ... Petitioner Vs

¶7

1.The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City Police, Vepery, Chennai.

¶8

2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, P-2 Otteri Police Station, Pulianthope, Chennai – 12.

¶9

3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, P-5, M.K.B Nagar Police Station, Vysarpadi, Chennai – 39.

¶10

4.The Inspector of Police, P-3 Vysarpardi Police Station, Chennai – 39. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer :- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the 1^st respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 01.09.2020 in accordance with law and provide gun men police protection to the petitioner enabling to live in peace.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Thenrajan

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Additional Public Prosecutor

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This petition has been filed to direct the 1^st respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 01.09.2020 in accordance with law and provide gun men police protection to the petitioner enabling to live in peace.

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

¶18

3.Without going into merits of the case, the 1^st respondent

¶19

is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 01.09.2020 on merits and in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶20

3.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition

¶21

is disposed of.

s/d-

Assistant Registrar

True Copy

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶26

gbi

¶27

¶28

1.The Commissioner of Police,

¶29

Chennai City Police, Vepery, Chennai.

¶30

2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police,

¶31

P-2 Otteri Police Station,

¶32

Pulianthope,

¶33

Chennai – 12.

¶34

3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, P-5, M.K.B Nagar Police Station, Vysarpadi,

¶35

Chennai – 39.

¶36

4.The Inspector of Police,

¶37

P-3 Vysarpardi Police Station,

¶38

Chennai – 39.

¶39

5.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶40

Crl.O.P.No.15201 of 2020

¶41

NMI(CO)

¶42

SP(11/11/2020)

¶43

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Krishnamoorthy v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishnamoorthy v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Narayana Samy Reddy Vs the State Rep.by

Rasu @ Ulagasamidurai Vs the State

M.K.Stalin M/47 Vs The Commissioner of Police

A.J.Jawad Vs the State Rep.by

Rangasamy Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Vaithiyanathasamy @ Vaitha Vs the State Rep.by