Dismissed

K.Sivanandhan v. the State Rep by Its

Madras HC23 Jun 2020CRL OP/9229/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira dismissed a bail application filed by the petitioner under Section 439 CrPC. Rejecting the prayer to enlarge the petitioner on bail, the Court noted that investigation was pending and no changes existed since a recent dismissal.

What did the court decide?

The prayer to enlarge the petitioner on bail was rejected and the criminal original petition was dismissed for the present.

K.Sivanandhan Vs the State Rep by Its — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.9229 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 23.06.2020

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶6

Crl.O.P.No.9229 of 2020
K.S.Sivanandham .. Petitioner
/versus/
The State Rep. By its
The Inspector of Police,
D-4, Kuniyamathur Police
Coimbatore City Station.
(Crime No.870 of 2020) .. Respondent

¶7

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in crime no.870/2020 on the file of the respondent police.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.E.C.Ramesh For Respondent : Mr.K.Prabhakar, Addl Public Prosecutor

¶9

O R D E R (The case has been heard through video conference)

¶10

The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.05.2020 in Crime No.870 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 454, 363, 395 and 397 I.P.C. , seek bail.

¶11

1/4

¶12

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶13

Crl.O.P.No.9229 of 2020

¶14

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶15

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner is the sole accused and the investigation is pending. Further, the earlier application filed by the petitioner was dismissed by this Court on 04.06.2020.

¶16

4.Taking into consideration of the facts of the case and also considering the fact that the earlier bail application filed by the petitioner was dismissed very recently on 04.06.2020 and as there is no change in the circumstances this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶17

5.This Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed for the
present.
23.06.2020
arr

¶18

2/4

¶19

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶20

Crl.O.P.No.9229 of 2020

¶21

¶22

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras

¶23

The Judicial Magistrate No.VII, Coimbatore.

¶24

The Inspector of Police, D-4, Kuniyamathur Police Coimbatore City Station.

¶25

3/4

¶26

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶27

Crl.O.P.No.9229 of 2020

¶28

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

¶29

arr

¶30

Crl.O.P.No.9229 of 2020

¶31

23.06.2020

¶32

4/4

¶33

http://www.judis.nic.in

K.Sivanandhan v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Sivanandhan v. the State Rep by Its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Senthil Kumar Vs State Rep by

Panneerselvam Vs the State Rep by Its

J.Sampath Vs the State Rep by Its

N.Deepak Raj Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Saravanan Vs State Rep by

Pandiyan Vs State Rep by