The petitioner sought bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The learned counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition. The Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.9227 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.06.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.O.P.No.9227 of 2020
1.P.Saravanan
2.P.Prabhu
3.T.Prakash
...Petitioners/Accused
Vs.
The State Rep. By
The Inspector of Police,
Orakadam Police Station,
Kancheepuram District.
Crime No.51 of 2020
...Respondent/Complainant
1/3
Crl.O.P.No.9227 of 2020
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending investigation in Crime No.51 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.
For petitioner : Mr.S.Mohamed
Ansar
For respondent : Mr.K.Prabakar
Additional Public Prosecutor
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J
ssb
ORDER
(The case has been heard through video conference)
2/3
Crl.O.P.No.9227 of 2020
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of
this Court to withdraw this petition.
Crl.O.P.No.9227 of 2020
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Saravanan
P.Prabhu
T.Prakash
The State Rep. By The Inspector of Police, Orakadam Police Station, Kancheepuram District.
A.D.Jagadish Chandira
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
