Dismissed

C.Pradeep v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC29 Oct 2020CRL OP/28982/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed a petition under Section 439(2) CrPC to cancel anticipatory bail granted to respondents, as the matter was settled amicably and the petition was listed for withdrawal with joint submission from parties.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the security deposit upon furnishing necessary documents before the Magistrate.

C.Pradeep Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

Crl.OP.No.28982 of 2019 in Crl.OP.No.26700 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 29.10.2020

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

Crl.OP.No.28982 of 2019
in
Crl.OP.No.26700 of 2019
C.Pradeep .. Petitioner / De-facto complainant
Vs.
1. The Inspector of Police,
T-1, Ambattur Police Station,
Chennai.
2. S.Bhuvaneshwari
3. Sakthivel .. Respondents / Respondents

¶7

PRAYER : Petition filed Under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to the 2^nd and 3^rd respondents in Crl.OP.No.26700 of 2019 on 15.10.2019.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sridhar For R1 : M/s.M.Saratha, GA (Crl.Side) For R2&R3 : Mr.G.Dhayashankar

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

Today, this Criminal Original Petition was listed under the caption

¶11

“for withdrawal”, on the basis of the letter dated 14.10.2020 written by the

¶12

1/4

¶13

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶14

Crl.OP.No.28982 of 2019 in Crl.OP.No.26700 of 2019

¶15

learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.M.Sridhar, addressed to the Registrar

¶16

(Criminal Side), wherein it was stated that the matter should be listed for withdrawal, as the matter has been settled between the parties.

¶17

This Court, vide order dated 15.10.2019 in Crl.O.P.No.26700 of

¶18

2019, granted anticipatory bail to the accused viz., Bhuvaneshwari and

¶19

Sakthivel, who are the respondents 2 and 3 herein, on condition that they

¶20

should deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- jointly, to the credit of Crime

¶21

No.1312 of 2019, now pending before the Judicial Magistrate Court,

¶22

Ambattur, Chennai.

¶23

3.It is reported by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

¶24

herein and the learned counsel for the accused as well as the learned

¶25

Government Advocate (Criminal side) that the accused has complied with

¶26

the aforesaid condition imposed by this Court, while granting anticipatory

¶27

bail to them, by order dated 15.10.2019. It is also reported that apart from

¶28

the said deposit, the accused has paid a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- by way of

¶29

Demand Draft bearing No.887018, dated 6.10.2020 drawn on Indian Bank,

¶30

2/4

¶31

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶32

Crl.OP.No.28982 of 2019 in Crl.OP.No.26700 of 2019

¶33

Ottari Branch in the name of the petitioner viz., C.Pradeep and a copy of the said demand draft has also been forwarded to Mr.M.Sridhar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner herein. Thus, the learned counsel appearing for both the parties jointly submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and hence, this Criminal Original Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.

¶34

4.Recording the aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel appearing for both the parties, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the case in Crime No.1312 of 2019 now pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur, Chennai. The petitioner/De-facto complainant/C.Pradeep is permitted to withdraw the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- lying in the credit of Crime No.1312 of 2019, on furnishing proper identity and undertaking before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambattur.

¶35

29.10.2020 Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No av Note: Issue order copy on 02.11.2020

¶36

3/4

¶37

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶38

Crl.OP.No.28982 of 2019 in Crl.OP.No.26700 of 2019

¶39

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

¶40

¶41

¶42

The Judicial Magistrate Court,
Ambattur, Chennai.
2. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
3. The Inspector of Police,
T-1, Ambattur Police Station,
Chennai.
Crl.OP.No.28982 of 2019
in
Crl.OP.No.26700 of 2019
29.10.2020

¶43

4/4

¶44

http://www.judis.nic.in

C.Pradeep v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Pradeep v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Krishnamurthy and Co. Engineering Contractors a Partnership Firm Vs Rmd Kwikform India Pvt.Ltd and 2 others

M/s.Shipping Corporation of India Limited, Owners and parties interested in the Vessel Mt Desh Vs Sivan P B

V.B. Vignesh Vs Dr. J.Muthukumaran, M.B.B.S., D.L.O., Ms.

Hatsun Agro Product Ltd, Having registered office at Vs M/s.Arogya Rahasya Pvt.Ltd.

Vivriti Capital Private Limited Vs Sambandh Finserve Private Limited and another

Aqua Pump Industries and another Vs Mr.Annem Veera Kumar Reddy and another