Disposed

K.Thirumurugan v. the State Rep.by

Madras HC28 Oct 2020CRL OP/16858/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the court directed the police to conduct an inquiry under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and issue a notice to the petitioner by a fixed date, permitting a future bail application if arrest grounds exist.

What did the court decide?

Directed the police to issue notice under S. 41(A) Cr.P.C., conduct enquiry, and communicate grounds for arrest by 27.11.2020 if applicable.

K.Thirumurugan Vs the State Rep.by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 28.10.2020

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.16858 of 2020

¶6

K. Thirumurugan ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Polur Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District. (Cr.No.Not Known of 2020) ... Respondent

¶9

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.Not Known of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.S.B. Vishwanathan

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor

¶12

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶13

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that petition enquiry in C.S.R.No.763 of 2020 is pending on the complaint of one Ranjith.

¶14

The respondent police has to issue notice under Section 41(A) of Cr.P.C., to the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein. The Investigating Officer is to either register a First Information Report or close the complaint by 27.11.2020. If the Investigating Officer has grounds to arrest the petitioner, then he has to state the reasons in writing and communicate the same to the petitioner and in that case, the petitioner is at liberty to file necessary https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ application before this Court seeking anticipatory bail.

¶15

With this observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶16

-sd/-
28/10/2020
This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried
into execution by all concerned
TRUE COPY
Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.)
High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
POLUR, THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT
2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
POLUR POLICE STATION,
THIRUVANNAMALAI DISTRICT.
CC to M/S.S.B.VISHWANATHAN Advocate on payment of necessary
charges
CRL OP.16858/2020
Date :28/10/2020
RVR 03/11/2020

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Thirumurugan v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Thirumurugan v. the State Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alamelu Vs the State Rep.by

Velayutham Vs the Inspector of Police

Vasanth David Vs the Inspector of Police

Gurumoorthy Vs State Rep by

S.Devendran @ Deva Vs the State Rep.by

Santhanam Vs the State Rep by